Where Did the Rafale Offset Billions Go? India’s Defence Transparency Question
India’s defence procurement policy mandates that foreign arms suppliers reinvest a portion of the contract value back into India—a model known as offsets. In theory, this builds local manufacturing capabilities, transfers high-end technology, and generates skilled jobs. But after nearly two decades and over ₹40,000 crore in offset obligations, many are asking: what’s the actual return? From Rafale to S-400, here’s a deep dive into the promises made and what was actually delivered.
What Are Defence Offsets?
Offsets are policy requirements imposed on foreign defence vendors to invest a part of the contract value into India. This can be through joint ventures, local sourcing, technology transfer, or establishing manufacturing infrastructure.
For example, the Rafale deal had a 50% offset clause, meaning Dassault Aviation and its partners were required to reinvest half the value of the ₹59,000 crore deal in India through various partnerships and investments.
How Big Is the Offset Pool?
As of 2025, India has signed defence deals with over ₹40,000 crore worth of offset commitments. However, public data shows that a significant portion of these obligations have not been fulfilled on time or lack transparency on actual deliverables.
- Rafale (Dassault): ₹30,000+ crore in offsets promised. Questions remain about the depth of technology transferred.
- Apache & Chinook (Boeing): Offset clause included engine manufacturing and aerospace investment. Progress is unclear.
- S-400 (Russia): No offset clause at all, despite India’s own guidelines recommending it for large deals.
What’s the Status of These Offsets?
Rafale Deal: Dassault and Safran were expected to assist DRDO in developing jet engine technology. However, DRDO later confirmed that the expected tech transfer never materialized. Much of the offset investment appears to have gone into low-end sourcing like fuselage parts and basic components.
Boeing: Boeing announced partnerships for UAV and engine component production in Hyderabad, but progress reports are sparse, and there's limited public data verifying job creation or tech transfer.
S-400: Russia’s refusal to commit to an offset clause raises concerns. India paid upfront with no provisions for local production or transfer of air defence tech.
Why Is There So Little Transparency?
Despite the scale of these obligations, India’s Ministry of Defence does not provide real-time updates or detailed audits of offset fulfillment. The information that does emerge often comes from CAG reports, parliamentary questions, or investigative reporting.
According to the CAG's 2020 audit, more than 50% of offset contracts failed to meet their targets. Some Indian companies used in these deals had no experience in defence production and were likely selected just to meet compliance on paper.
Missed Opportunities
Offsets were meant to help India acquire core technologies—like jet engines, AESA radars, or precision-guided systems. But due to weak enforcement and loose definitions, most offset fulfilment has been limited to:
- Low-value part manufacturing
- Setting up maintenance units (not full production)
- Non-defence related IT or services
Defence experts argue that this results in lost opportunities to boost India’s true defence production capacity under initiatives like Aatmanirbhar Bharat.
What Needs to Change?
- Transparent Reporting: Offset contracts should be published with milestones, deadlines, and status updates.
- Independent Oversight: Third-party audits (CAG or Parliament committees) must be mandated for every major offset contract.
- Accountability: Penal provisions should be enforced when offset clauses are not honoured.
- Focus on Real Tech Transfer: Instead of just parts sourcing, deals must prioritize key technologies India lacks.
Conclusion
Defence offsets were designed to turn foreign defence purchases into engines of growth and self-reliance. But without public accountability, these obligations risk becoming a checkbox exercise. As India signs new deals—such as the GE-F414 engine for Tejas Mk2 and MQ-9B drones—the time to demand full offset transparency is now.
No comments:
Post a Comment